I kept hearing that during the game, and it was a common criticism after the game, but I don't think it's true. Here were all his carries by quarter, situation, and result.
1Q, 1st & 10, -4 yds
1Q, 2nd & 14, 24 yds
1Q, 2nd & 10, 2 yds
1Q, 2nd & 15, 11 yds
2Q, 1st & 10, 6 yds
2Q, 2nd & 4, 6 yds
2Q, 1st & 10, 2 yds
3Q, 1st & 10, 9 yds
4Q, 1st & 10, -3 yds
4Q, 1st & 10, 1 yd
4Q, 1st & 10, 1 yd
4Q, 3rd & 20, 3 yds
4Q, 1st & 10, 2 yds
We didn't really give up on him, he just mostly got stopped after having the early success. Not necessarily his fault or anything he did wrong (I'm not sure one way or the other without going back to watch), but 4 of his first 6 carries were really good, and then 5 of his last 7 carries were on 1st down and resulted in 2nd and long. I suspect it's either just random distribution and clumping, or else they started clamping down on our run game more and more game went on and our passing game kept being rather non-threatening.
Click to expand...