I remember when sooners would come on this board and argue the same thing. We get it. You hate Mack Brown and do not think much of his or Texas’s success in the 2000s. I will never understand Texas fans trying to diminish their own school’s past successes or fans hating either coach that won us a national title.
From 2000-2010 only Boise State and OU won more games than Texas and Mack Brown. Apparently being good at motivational speaking and hiring assistants led to more victories than all but two other programs. Bobby Bowden also somehow won a lot of football games the same way.
The two most successful coaches in the 2000s (Brown and Stoops) being in the same division does not mean the other “could not coach”. Stop and think about the argument for Mack Brown being a “bad coach.” The argument is “he did not win as many games as Bob Stoops in the 2000s. Bob Stoops won the most games. Mack Brown not winning the most games of any coach and only winning the second most games makes him a bad coach.” That’s moronic. If Brown and Stoops are not in each other’s division, they both win even more and probably face each other in multiple national title games.
You do not win a 100+ games in a decade if you “cant coach”. The stats do not lie.
-
Like x 6
Last edited: Nov 30, 2018