Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'West Mall' started by Seattle Husker, Sep 10, 2018.
This attention ***** needs to go away.
No, she's all yours. This is what happens when people turn democrat and perform for the media.
Nah...she's simply a frontrunner. I doubt she's beholden to any party but the one she's in the moment.
Omarosa is a self-serving attention *****, and I don't think she's a partisan Democrat. If she thinks it'll help her, she'll jump back on the Trump Train in 2020, and he might even be dumb enough to hire her back. She was a laughably stupid hire in the first place.
She is not of the Democratic Party. She is a useful idiot for the Democrats. If Trump loses in 2020, she will lose her relevance. Think Cindy Sheehan. She was a useful idiot for a few years, becauseb she was a disruptive force against the Bush Administration. However, when Obama won, she lost her usefulness. She stayed active after the election, but her camera time largely went away. Having a screaming troublemaker disrupting the Administration isn't useful when a Democrat is in the White House.
The example of Cindy Sheehan and the lists of soldiers dead after news casts which ended in 2008 should have been a big hit to the Democrats reliability. Those are just 2 large examples of how the Democrats raise an issue just to paint an opponent in a poor light even while participating in it when they are in power. It should even more decrease the publics faith in traditional media. They are clearly complicit in the Democrats hypocrisy and clearly work in concert with the Democratic party to get out their message.
Democrats will point out Republicans hypocrisy as a defense. They are right. The current party system in the US is due for a shake up because both are too similar viewpoint even at the same time divisive politically and socially.
Plus the US needs a true small government, economically sound alternative. The Republicans increasing are showing they are not that. Even Trump isn't that with his trade policy and increasing the deficit.
Omarosa was a useful idiot for Trump too. She was used to demonstrate how "inclusive" he is.
Perhaps, but I don't remember him using her very much during the campaign. Maybe she was out there, but I didn't see a lot of her. I saw Diamonds and Pearls (or whatever their names were) a lot more.
Interesting that Dems try to portray Trump as a racist when his history shows otherwise.
Is this a fact or your opinion?
It's clearly an opinion, and clearly based on poor information.
He's going back and forth on another thread saying that @Horn6721 doesn't know the difference, but here he sounds like he is espousing an opinion as if it's a fact.
Omarosa was Trump's Director of African American Outreach during his campaign.
Negative. My comments were to theiioftex of which I quoted then somehow Horn6721 is the target? Is there some sort of hivemind I should be aware of?
Clearly you think she had an important purpose as Director of African American Outreach for Donald Trump's campaign?
I think she served no real purpose beyond getting some free publicity.
She did a fantastic job. Especially since black approval is higher in the post-Omarosa era than the Omarosa era. (Correlation is not causation, but still, it's kind of funny...)
Based on what we know about her, I wonder if her idea of "African American Outreach" was to go to parties, hang out in swanky resorts, and tell people she works for Trump if anyone asks.