WH rejects Solyndra subpoena request

Discussion in 'West Mall' started by Leftwith, Nov 5, 2011.

  1. Leftwith

    Leftwith 500+ Posts

    Here was their excuse for not complying:

     
  2. 2003TexasGrad

    2003TexasGrad Son of a Motherless Goat

    All they have to say is "National Security! Amber Alert! 911! Al-Qaeda is coming! Al-Qaeda is coming! National Security! Durka Durka Durka!!!!!"

    [​IMG]
     
  3. Leftwith

    Leftwith 500+ Posts

    And they'd look like idiots. Not that they already don't.

    Blaming it on partisanship? These thugs have no shame and have permanently soiled the Office of the Presidency.
     
  4. 77horn

    77horn 500+ Posts

    So much for being a nation of laws.
     
  5. dalhorn1

    dalhorn1 1,000+ Posts

    "I HOPE you don't mind if I CHANGE the laws without approval while I'm in office"

    Signed, B O
     
  6. Leftwith

    Leftwith 500+ Posts

    Can I use this partisanship thing the next time the IRS wants to audit me?

    I think I will.
     
  7. TexasGolf

    TexasGolf 2,500+ Posts

    above the law this bunch

    too busy suing other states
     
  8. general35

    general35 5,000+ Posts

    "I can only conclude that your decision to issue a subpoena, authorized by a party-line vote, was driven more by partisan politics than a legitimate effort to conduct a responsible investigation"
    ___________________________________________________

    she's too stupid to just claim executive privilege.
     
  9. Crockett

    Crockett 5,000+ Posts

    You realize the White House has already turned over 85,000 pages of documents including all official memos on Solyndra? What House Republicans want access to now is all sensetive political communications where the word Solyndra is so much as mentioned. It's long been understood that there's a lot of sensetive political communications that goes on within administrations that is never opened to the glaring eye of the public. Should every communication in the Reagan administration that included the words "Iran" or "Contra" have been released? I think protection of executive priviledge is the responsibility of every administration. If George W. Bush or any other former president or vice president weighs in on this deal on the side of giving the docments, I'll take it seriously. The partisan rag from the link above made no effort to help us understand the complexities of the issue here. It does not deserve to be taken seriously.
     
  10. majorwhiteapples

    majorwhiteapples 5,000+ Posts

    I thought this was the transparency Administration?
     
  11. I35

    I35 5,000+ Posts

    In reply to:


     
  12. Crockett

    Crockett 5,000+ Posts

    I'm not sure where you pulled the 42 percent from. Was that the percentage of Republicans who fed a steady diet of partisan gruel believe Barak Obama was born in Kenya? Sadly, too many accept any media that says what they want to hear and ignore more serious media that allow complexities to shine through. I don't believe it because Obama says it. But he's more credible that a one-sided internet site that I've never hears of before and tells only half of the story on this one.
     
  13. I35

    I35 5,000+ Posts

    It was a CNN poll conducted last week of Hussien Obama's approval rating. Not good when it's that low and done by a lefty network.
     

Share This Page