for the record.. (sic!)
Theme: How is Iowa's schedule any worse? How is Baylor's NC games any worse? How is anybody's schedule ... of the current Top 10 teams... any worse than Notre Dames's. Answer: they aren't.
First to say: Notre Dame HAS NOT BEATEN A RANKED TEAM
Has only beaten 4 teams with a winning record.
Here's the big list of teams better than .500 they have beaten:
Navy, USC, Temple, Pitt WoW!!!! what an accomplishment!
Notre Dame has beaten
4-6, Texas (Big 12) Whoopie Do unranked
4-7, U Virginia (ACC) unranked
3-8, Ga Tech (ACC, last place Coastal Div) unranked
2-9, U Mass (Mid America, same as Kent, Buffalo, Toledo, etc.) unranked
9-1, Navy (Am Athletic Conf, same as SMU, Tulane, etc.) unranked
7-4, USC (Pac 12) unranked
9-2, Temple (Am Athletic Conf, same as SMU, Tulane, etc.) unranked
8-3, Pitt (ACC) unranked
3-8, Wake Forest (ACC, tied for last place Atlantic Div) unranked
3-8, Boston College (ACC, tied for last place Atlantic Div) unranked
------
52-56 combined record. .481 percentage for all opponents they have beaten.
Only Temple and Pitt are leading, or competitive, in repective conf.
Neither of those two are Power 5 teams.
Played 6 ACC teams (in effect, their conference).
Lost to #1 Clemson, beat all the rest, three of which are in last place in their divisions.
If fully in ACC, ND would not even make the conference title game.
Further, since they have already lost to a top 4 team, they have lost the playoffs already.
I think Stanford beats them by double digits and embarrasses them.
If $EC gets favors, they still TRAIL Domers in favors.
Last edited by a moderator: Nov 22, 2015