INT in endzone?

Discussion in 'On The Field' started by shrtcke128, Oct 11, 2008.

  1. shrtcke128

    shrtcke128 < 25 Posts

    can someone explain to me how we did not turnover the ball in blowu's favor when Colt through for the TD? i dont understand that call at all....please explain.
    thanks!

    HOOKEM HORNS!!!
     
  2. RockyBalboa

    RockyBalboa 500+ Posts

    blown call by refs. but their first TD wasn't actually a TD, so we're all even.
     
  3. slikwille

    slikwille 25+ Posts

    The on-field Refs and review officials are TERRIBLE this game. Let's just hope that is the last bad call of the game.
     
  4. toughandcool

    toughandcool 100+ Posts

    I thought you had to maintain possession of a reception all the way to the ground or it's incomplete.
     
  5. GemStateJim

    GemStateJim 2,500+ Posts

    Repeating a second time (sorry to beat a dead horse, but a buncha threads popped up about this:

    Had the officials done their job, the INT wouldn't have stood because No.30 should've been flagged for defensive holding. That would've given Texas a fresh set of downs from near the 10-yard line, so it's a push.
     
  6. slikwille

    slikwille 25+ Posts

    You need to show at some point before you hit the ground that you have possession. Then if the ground pops the ball loose it is still a catch. At least that is my understanding of the rule.
     
  7. TenDeadF1ngerz

    TenDeadF1ngerz 100+ Posts

    Drew Kelson



    Rose Bowl
     
  8. WhHorn

    WhHorn 250+ Posts

    According to Way and Moreland on a pass, the ground can cause an incompletion.
     
  9. LonghornCougar

    LonghornCougar 1,000+ Posts

    From what I know of the rule, the ground can not cause a fumble, but then thats usually on receptions, its kind of different on an interceptions (it would seem anyways). Thats part of the game though, calls go both ways and you have to deal with them. That wasn't as bad as Knall.... that was just pathetic.
     
  10. RP McMurphy

    RP McMurphy 100+ Posts

    "Ground can't cause a fumble"

    There is no fumble if there is no possession. You have to hang on to the ball all the way to the ground. Incomplete.

    Hook'em Horns
     
  11. Sgt. Longhorn

    Sgt. Longhorn 100+ Posts

    If the receiver (or defender in this case) goes to the ground on a catch, he must maintain possession or it is incomplete.

    The officials know the rules. The announcers don't. It was a good call and anybody who says it wasn't (I'm looking at you Brent) is WRONG.
     
  12. _e.

    _e. 25+ Posts

    I must be wrong, but we got away with one there...because that looked complete...but I could be drunk...
     
  13. FWHORN

    FWHORN 10,000+ Posts

    The announcers are just wrong, ground can cause an incomplete its the same call as the Kelson not int in the Rose Bowl.
     
  14. GoHornsGo90

    GoHornsGo90 1,000+ Posts

    No, it was obviously a missed call and a great play by the defender. Anybody who tells you otherwise is just flat out wrong. It was karma to the utmost for that AWFUL hold on the TE. Herbstreit and Musburger know their ****, TRUST me. And they have a much better angle than the officials after the dozens of reviews.
     
  15. Ok_Longhorn

    Ok_Longhorn 25+ Posts

    Exactly, you have to show you have control or the ground can cause an incompletion. The announcers are idiots. Nothing new I know but..
     
  16. Superfan

    Superfan 250+ Posts


     
  17. Sgt. Longhorn

    Sgt. Longhorn 100+ Posts

    GHG90. You are wrong and so are Brent and Herb.

    I was an official for 5 years.
     
  18. Aragorn

    Aragorn 250+ Posts

    A lot of new posters pretending to be Horns around here today. The Sooners got away with the hold that may have cost Texas a touchdown and were handed another score on the "running into the kicker" acting job by the Oklahoma punter. OU got a lot of breaks today. They were lucky the score was as close as it was.

    Btw, incomplete was the correct call.
     

Share This Page