Some of these comments are just silly. Comparing one situation (or program, or player for that matter) to another is an exercise in futility. It's fine to discuss transfers (in particular, when they actually happen), and their ensuing impact on the team. But tossing around terms like "player development', or discussing playing time and other potential reasons for departures that haven't happened yet, or throwing shade at a coaching staff that has easily been among the best in the country, just doesn't fly. A few things to consider....
The Horns have actually been incredibly lucky with respect to transfers in recent years, though luck probably had little to do with how things turned out. I am referring specifically to our top recruits (top 30, or McD AA's). Going back as far as 6 classes, and Imani, we've yet to lose a single one of our most highly touted incoming players. To the contrary, we've benefited from one such departure from another program. Yet I would never say SC wasn't giving Jatarie enough playing time, or 'developing' her properly, or even that she might not have done well had she stayed with the Gamecocks. All anyone can say is it didn't work out, or wasn't a good fit. Just how successful we've been at holding on to top talent is in evidence when I see the list posted above reflecting half of the HG top 25 from 2016 alone have already moved on; I'd hate to see what a full list of all top 25 transfers from 2012-2016 looked like. Yet, Imani, Ariel, Brooke, Lashann, Jordan, Joyner, Sug - and now joined by Jatarie - are all still Horns. There's a reason for that, which might be something for our 2017 class to consider when looking at their respective futures.
There are 350 Div I women's basketball programs. Just 6 have managed to make the last four Sweet 16's. UCONN, ND, SC, Texas, Baylor and Stanford. That says all you need to know about how far this program has come in an unbelievably short period of time. Look at the top programs that haven't managed to keep pace....Tennessee, Duke and Maryland have two final 16 appearances each during that stretch, and the Ags - just seven years removed from a NC - have made it just once. Another conference foe, OU hasn't made the Sweet 16 for five consecutive seasons (after eight appearances from 2000-2011). Maintaining that level of success for that length of time is a difficult thing to accomplish, as evidenced by the short list of teams who've managed to do it.
As I've posted elsewhere, I'm a huge fan of McGraw, and what she accomplished in the face of adversity this season. I love that most felt the Irish were the least likely #1 seed to win the title this year; no doubt many felt several #2 seeds were in a with a better chance. ND proved them all wrong. But attempting to compare what the Irish accomplished to where others ended up is a fool's errand. And drawing parallels, or lack thereof with respect to player development is even more ridiculous. Recall that ND won the NC in 2001. For the next nine seasons they failed to get beyond the Sweet 16. Six of those nine seasons they lost in the first or second round. ND still had some great players. Muffet was still the coach. Did she suddenly forget how to develop those recruits? Did it all come back to her suddenly in 2010, when things turned around in a big way for the Irish, finally culminating in this year's result. Maybe these traits are one decade on, the next off?
Let's keep it real. There are always reasons for why things happen, both good and bad, for programs. And seldom are they what is speculated about on message boards. Or perhaps a part of what's going on makes it on to a forum, without full context, and with the poster's personal spin or agenda (incorrectly) accounting for the remaining details. Success happens when all the pieces are there - players, staff - even if you reach the bare minimum on one count, as happened with ND this season. But sometimes when everything looks the best on paper, the end result doesn't reflect that. That's happened to every program at some point, including the Irish. At other times things just click, even when all signs indicate they shouldn't.
With respect to our 2017 class, things will play out as they're supposed to. Whether all stay or all go, or we end up somewhere in between, life continues for all concerned. We are going to have a roster full of phenomenal players, and the recent success of this program will continue. I'd be a bit more surprised to hear that Chas has left the program, given the strides she made at the end of the season, and that she is all but guaranteed to play a significant role next year. If she does depart I doubt it will be for any of the reasons that have been mentioned on this board. She, and those around her realize her playing time and 'development' would not have been managed any better anywhere else. And they're also smart enough to know if they're hearing that from any quarter, that's not someone who has her best interests in mind. I can't see why she'd want to sit out for a full year, and start all over somewhere else - in particular, given the opportunity she is going to have this fall with the Horns. But if moving on is what's best for her, or if she thinks it is, we should all wish her the best.
With all that said, I hope we can stop talking about freshman playing time and development. Or comparing players and programs when it isn't possible to do that in any type of meaningful way. If you're trying to make a point you can find a hundred so-called "examples" to justify whatever position you're taking. But every recruit is different. Every roster is different. Strength of schedule and caliber of competition is different. Fitness levels are different. Ability to play defense or learn schemes are different. For each freshman that played a key role, or started or saw significant action their first season, there are a dozen others who didn't...including a long list of #1 recruits over the years. Coaches want all players to contribute, and top recruits in particular. No one is held out for philosophical reasons. We have one of the top staffs in the country. We develop talent as well as anyone, and better than most. Whatever happens, I am more excited than even about this program. Great days are ahead!
Click to expand...