There has not been one single national security damaging aspect to any of the declassification, as I don't consider damage to the image of the FBI a national security issue. Now compare that to the lack of any squawking from the FBI or CIA directors, when one of their own employees calls up the NY Slimes or Bezos Bulletin and leaks whatever they want to. Reason - almost always, those leaks are designed to make their agency look good, while damaging their political opponents. Any actual damage to national security is a price they are more than willing to pay.
Wow. Using the CIA for domestic spying. On your political opposition If true, people should hang for this
Anyone else not surprised? Yawn... u-s-attorney-john-durham-will-not-release-report-on-russia-criminal-investigation-before-election-report-says
Article indicates he is waiting for Barr and Durham like everyone else. Odd since he is deemed to be a fascist dictator.
No, because it's an unfinished report. Durham was recently handed over 1,000 pages of documents to sort through by Ratcliffe so it will be awhile.
It is some delicate timing. If Biden wins, he will effectively end all of this Day One. When he gets around to announcing it wont matter, because it will be DOA as soon as he is sworn in And there will be no impeachment for interfering with the DOJ or the administration of justice either That means Durham will have, at most, 3 months to get some indictments out. Formal indictments will be trickier for Biden (or whomever is actually controlling the Presidency at that point)(Soros? Hillary? Harris? who knows)) to interfere with. Not saying they wont do it, because they probably will. I am just saying it will be much harder to accomplish. And Wray will keeping playing hide the salami until then. It looks to be quite the battle to the bitter end between Wray on one side, and Trump/Ratcliffe on the other just to get everything relevant out into the public domain
I guess I am naive. I would think people in the fence on who to vote for would go Trump if this was all out prior to the election. I am just resigned that no matter what evidence or what the "report" says, none of them will face any indictments or anything. The article I posted, did you notice that it says the Durham report will not be out, according to a report. That's how all this works. It takes a report to report on another report that may or may not ever be released as a report.
What happened here should have never have happened in the US and should never happen again. To ensure that it does not, someone(s) needs to hang for it
I don't disagree, it's just that The Swamp isn't going to dredge itself, no matter how respected Barr and Durham may be. They all go to the same cocktail parties most likely. They still want to be invited, I'm guessing.
You may be correct, which makes me wonder if someone else might try. Not encouraging it, just simply foreseeing it as a possible eventual event.
I certainly hope so and, of course, would be happy to eat crow if Barr and Durham do actually bring indictments.
Exactly as we have been saying from the outset This was not a criminal investigation but a coup attempt (and a massive ***-covered event) ]
I continue to think someone, someday will act against them If this was a prop bet in Vegas, I would jump on it
Hunter Biden’s laptop was seized by the FBI in Dec (during impeachment). It reveals info about the Bidens' shady business deals with Ukraine. Wray sat on it
The left has been celebrating this as fact but yet it's relying upon anonymous sources once again. 'Unmasking' investigation closes without report or charges: report
Catherine Herridge says Bruce Ohr, infamous for backchanneling the discredited Steele dossier, resigned from DOJ the day before he was going to be terminated by DOJ over his conduct noted in the IG report with regard to attempted coup.
