Hillary is not out of the woods yet

Discussion in 'West Mall' started by Joe Fan, Jan 29, 2017.

  1. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Hillary's guy Wiener reported to prison (sexting a minor)
    Weiner was hand-picked by Chuckles Schumer
    Weiner worked for him as his congressional aide for 6 years
    And then Weiner took Schumer's old seat in Congress
    Hard to believe no one noticed anything all that time. Not only that, but it's likely nothing would have ever happened to him without the digital proof
    Democrats cover for their own - even sexual assault, kiddie porn and statutory rape
     
  2. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    So some new releases from the FBI to Congress show an early draft by Comey on the Hillary email scandal case accused her "gross negligent” in handling classified information. He later made the change “extremely careless.” Apparently with no disclosure of why he changed the wording.

    The change matters as federal law makes gross negligence in handling the nation’s intelligence a crime. Many other federal employees have not been to lucky to have a friend like Comey looking out for them, and have been nailed by this statute.

    “There is evidence to support a conclusion that Secretary Clinton, and others, used the email server in a manner that was grossly negligent with respect to the handling of classified information”

    -- Comey draft from May 2016.​
     
  3. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    My goodness

     
  4. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    More from Brazile
    Confirming what we wrote in here, at the time
    And were called names for it, at the time

    [​IMG]
     
    Brad Austin likes this.
  5. horninchicago

    horninchicago 2,500+ Posts

    It would have made matters worse with an honest media holding their feet to the fire on the BS pneumonia story. But, we have a dishonest media, so....someone should start a thread on that. :D
     
    I35 likes this.
  6. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Going to be harder and harder for media to ignore it
    When everyone they know is reading it
    lol
    (but those posters in here will just disappear until the coast is clear, pretend it never happened)

     
  7. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Brazile unleashed

    Bad language warning
    .... This feels like power and control. Gentlemen, let’s just put our dicks out on the table and see who’s got the bigger one, because I know mine is bigger than all of yours.” ....

     
  8. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

  9. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

  10. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

  11. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Donna Brazile is being this guy now

    [​IMG]
     
    I35 likes this.
  12. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Clintonite to the end
    Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D-VA) -- "no one cares that the DNC Primary was rigged..."
     
  13. Sangre Naranjada

    Sangre Naranjada 5,000+ Posts

    He is telling the truth. Democrats are very Machiavellian when it comes to elections. The results (if a win) always justify the means.
     
    mb227, mchammer and Joe Fan like this.
  14. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Cant remember if I posted this already or not but Trey Gowdy has formally reopened the Hillary Email case of 2016

    https://judiciary.house.gov/press-r...y-open-investigation-decisions-made-doj-2016/

    “Our justice system is represented by a blind-folded woman holding a set of scales. Those scales do not tip to the right or the left; they do not recognize wealth, power, or social status. The impartiality of our justice system is the bedrock of our republic and our fellow citizens must have confidence in its objectivity, independence, and evenhandedness. The law is the most equalizing force in this country. No entity or individual is exempt from oversight.

    “Decisions made by the Department of Justice in 2016 have led to a host of outstanding questions that must be answered. These include, but are not limited to:

    -- FBI’s decision to publicly announce the investigation into Secretary Clinton’s handling of classified information but not to publicly announce the investigation into campaign associates of then-candidate Donald Trump;
    -- FBI’s decision to notify Congress by formal letter of the status of the investigation both in October and November of 2016;
    -- FBI’s decision to appropriate full decision making in respect to charging or not charging Secretary Clinton to the FBI rather than the DOJ;
    -- FBI’s timeline in respect to charging decisions.
     
  15. theiioftx

    theiioftx 2,500+ Posts

    We need more Trey Gowdy's.
     
    Joe Fan and militaryhorn like this.
  16. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Here, Brazile cracks up Tucker Carlson

     
  17. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Personally I would prefer the AG just step up to the job, but here is this anyway .....

     
  18. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    [​IMG]
     
    I35 likes this.
  19. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Hillary does not think a SC is needed for Uranium One
    Now that her party is no longer in power, she claims she is offended at the idea of "abuse of power." She says she is now a fan of the "rule of law."
    In the exchange, she unwittingly describes the Mueller investigation to a T

     
  20. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Rove responds to her in that clip^

     
  21. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Here is an editorial piece from the NYPost
    They leave many things out, like the direct payments from the Russians to Bill Clinton

    "The Justice Department has a duty to consider a probe of the Uranium One sale"
    https://nypost.com/2017/11/15/the-j...-to-consider-a-probe-of-the-uranium-one-sale/

    If crimes were committed to further Russia’s nuclear goals here, Americans need to know. And if Team Obama suspected that but still OK’d the Uranium One sale to a Russian firm, Americans deserve an explanation of that, too.

    Yet Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ orders to prosecutors merely to see if a probe — perhaps headed by a special counsel — is warranted has critics in a lather.

    No surprise there: The left fears a probe into Team Obama and the Clinton Foundation could taint Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, even if it turned up no damaging evidence. Worse, it could draw attention from the FBI investigation of Russian meddling in the 2016 election and possible collusion by President Trump’s campaign.
    * * * *

    Peter Schweizer’s book “Clinton Cash” raised red flags in 2015 about the Uranium One sale and its owners’ donations to the Clinton Foundation. Last month, The Hill reported that the FBI had evidence — even before Hillary & Co. OK’d that sale — of Russian “bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money-laundering” meant to “grow” Vladimir Putin’s nuclear interests in America.

    Congress is right to look into this. Not to damage Clinton or Obama politically (a pointless exercise anyway), but to find out what Russia did and how to respond. Similarly, Justice should feel free to see if it needs to probe possible crimes."
     
    Last edited: Nov 16, 2017
  22. Seattle Husker

    Seattle Husker 5,000+ Posts

    Shep Smith's view on Uranium One controversy. Lot's of unhappy Fox viewers.
     
  23. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

  24. NJlonghorn

    NJlonghorn 1,000+ Posts

    A plane and a chopper collide midair and crash into the woods a half mile from a country home that is owned by a foundation affiliated with Baron Rothschild but used as a museum, not a residence. Sounds like a worthwhile addition to a thread about Hillary Clinton scandals.
     
  25. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Which was the better thread?
    A Rothchild dead in a helicopter crash is worth noting, no matter what you think
     
  26. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    Some lawsuits over FOIA requests and an investigation by a newspaper in DC have lifted the cover a bit on how the Clinton Crime Family operated. See https://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/state-department-approved-215-bill-clinton-speeches-controversial-consulting-deal-worth-48m-hillary-clintons-cos-copied-decisions/?utm_source=t.co&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=corruption chronicles

    While Hillary was acting as Secretary of State, Bill Clinton gave 215 speeches earning a staggering $48 million. Each speech had to be reviewed and approved by State Department officials. The documents show they never disapproved of any speech or appearance.

    Many of these "speeches" were paid by a rogues gallery of dodgy regimes and nations including China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Panama,Turkey, Taiwan, India and the Cayman Islands. These Govts and entities had serious business/policy interests inside the US or with the US Govt. All of this occurred while Bill's wife presided over US foreign policy. And each approval memo copied to Cheryl Mills, Hillary’s senior counsel and chief of staff.

    The Clintons had this act down pat. For each dodgy deal they did, the main payment method was Bill's speeches and/or donations to the Clinton Foundation. The donor dealt with Bill and then Hillary would use her power as Sect of State to make sure the donor got what they wanted.

    In many cases, the actual donors would donate to a charity in another country first (often Canada), which would then donate to the Clinton Foundation. This acted to hide the actual identity of the "donors."

    Once the funds landed in the US accounts of the Clinton Foundation, the Clintons could then use it as their personal bank account. They also funded some genuine charitable to keep up the front. One infamous example was when Chelsea Clinton used Foundation’s cash to pay for her wedding, living expenses and even taxes on gifts.
    https://nypost.com/2016/11/06/chelsea-clinton-used-foundation-to-help-pay-for-wedding-emails/
    See also https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...tons-wealth-tied-clinton-foundation/92842822/

    The Clinton Foundation was a criminal scheme from the outset. Most sensible people recognize this. Bill and Hillary even used the expertise of heavyweight crooks to help them set it up, such as Marc Rich, who Bill Clinton pardoned on his last day in office. At the time, Rich was on the FBIs most wanted list. https://nypost.com/2016/01/17/after-pardoning-criminal-marc-rich-clintons-made-millions-off-friends/ The Rich pardon was approved by Eric Holder
    https://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyp...as-alleged-tax-evader-marc-rich/#3bea124fe19f

    Rich's specialty, the reason he was on the Most Wanted List, is that he was world class at tax evasion, money laundering, wire fraud and racketeering (his indictment contained 65 separate charges). Rich had been a loyal Clintonista for along time. But he was only useful to them only if he was free. So if you ever wondered about the Marc Rich pardon, there you go.

    In summary, the Clinton Foundation was a front for a criminal enterprise created by Hillary and Bill Clinton. They were protected by pros. They engaged in racketeering, tax evasion, money laundering, fraud and numerous other serious crimes. After the Clintons left the White House, they were close to insolvent. Today they are worth $250 million, that out. They pulled this off in only ~15 years, despite one of them being unemployed and the other working on a Govt salary most of those years.

    As far as how they got away with it. They havent yet. I think they never thought they would lose power like we are seeing now. I still look for justice to be done.
    http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...ton-greed-corruption-power-cynicism-endlessly
    See also https://www.forbes.com/sites/danale...on-how-much-earnings-rich-white/#4bc11fa27a16
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2017 at 7:58 PM
  27. Joe Fan

    Joe Fan 10,000+ Posts

    More on the above, forgot to mention how Bill's speaking fees went up while Hillary was SOS.

    "Where he once had drawn $150,000 for a typical address in the years following his presidency, Clinton saw a succession of staggering paydays for speeches in 2010 and 2011, including $500,000 paid by a Russian investment bank and $750,000 to address a telecom conference in China.

    “It’s unusual to see a former president’s speaking fee go up over time,” said Richard Painter, who served as chief ethics lawyer in the White House Counsel’s office under President George W. Bush. “I must say I’m surprised that he raised his fees.
    * * *
    ... (the) records supported the premise that former President Clinton accepted speaking fees from numerous companies and individuals with interests pending before the State Department....

    In October 2010, for instance, Clinton accepted $225,000 to give a speech in Jamaica sponsored in part by the Irish telecom firm Digicel. Just weeks earlier, Digicel had submitted an application to USAID, an agency overseen by the State Department, for millions of dollars in grant money to fund a mobile-phone money transfer service in Haiti. Two months after the speech, Digicel received the first installment of grant money. The company’s chairman, Irish billionaire Denis O'Brien, was also a major contributor to the Clintons' charitable enterprises."

    Here is ABC's take on this http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/bill-clinton-cashed-hillary-secretary-state/story?id=30522705
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2017 at 8:38 PM
  28. Seattle Husker

    Seattle Husker 5,000+ Posts

    It's part of an ongoing conservative extremist narrative that the Clinton's are mafia equivalents, personally orchestrating the mysterious deaths of 10's of individuals. Some alt-right person right now is adding this to an obtuse website that will blame the Clinton's for this death. JoeFan, of course doesn't believe it but thought it important enough to post it on Horfans on this thread. Cue the "JoeFan isn't alt-right" symphony.
     
  29. Seattle Husker

    Seattle Husker 5,000+ Posts

    Really? I must have missed the "rich people who died in accidents" thread.
     
  30. Garmel

    Garmel 500+ Posts

    Sorry, he isn't. ;) You're falling for left wing propaganda.
     

Share This Page