Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'West Mall' started by mchammer, Sep 24, 2019.
The Big guy gets 10%. Just so you know.
No, but he spent more than 100 times his salary of government money at his resorts while in office to golf outings and the like.
The problem is we can nit pick about every president. Obama droned innocent children. I wonder how he sleeps at night. He sent guns into Mexico that killed Americans. We can go on and on with Bush and Clinton and so forth. However, outrage has really become a cottage industry over the last several years and it's getting worse.
Um...you pointed out the $1M in salary he donated to laud Trump. He profited $100M because of what his resorts charged secret service to stay at the resorts to protect him. The jump to the rest of the topics are distraction attempt because the original point was ludicrous when looked at holistically. He literally was our most expensive POTUS ever adjusted for inflation, by oders of magnitude.
I'll admit that appointing Swallwell is pretty dumb.
The point was made that he should forfeit a presidential pension as if that would be some kind of punishment. I implied by my post that Trump likely wouldn't accept this by virtue of his voluntarily forfeiting his entire four year salary. Of course this was met with more nitpicking by pointing out how much he spent on traveling back to Florida, to show that his forfeiting said salary didn't diminish his overwhelming sin.
So here we are just looking for dirt wherever we can find it. I pointed out you can find dirt on every president. So good job everyone. Thank God Trump didn't take a salary because if he did people would ***** about that too. All he says and does must be pure evil lest you burst into flames.
Here is a big part of the House impeachment management team
Fart Fart and Fang Fang
If nitpicking is the metaphor ...it's a nit that grows into a 25 pound louse.
But did it cost the taxpayers any more than if they stayed at other hotels? More Lib envy of what others may have.
Pravda, err the NYT, has already been forced to change their story...the original never even quoted any sources. At least in the old days, a confidential source would be cited that had been confirmed through other avenues. Now they just make it up in time to put on the website...
Which shows how quickly crap is considered to be 'news' simply because the lie originated with the NYT.
I thought it was bang bang and yang yang.
What part of the story changed? The original link still works and the overall gist of the story appears to be the same. Not that I would be surprised. The NYT has become a joke.
Another turncoat. F Geraldo.
Geraldo seriously expects us to believe that it was only logical to expect an assault on the Capitol building? Really? Come on man.
Headline was changed at least twice after original publication when both McCarthy and McConnell stated the claims were crap.
He’s always been a hack.
Hes trying to wriggle back into the good graces of who he thinks will be important for the next 4 years.
Interesting. It didn't sound like something Mitch would support. Politically, its a very risky move and I cannot see how convicting Trump after he leaves office will help the Republican party. Will keep an eye out on Mitch for when he decides to grant an interview on this topic.
There are a number of noted jurists who have noted that it appears that the Senate would lack the Constitutional ability to impeach following a departure from office at the expiration of a term.
Sadly, some on the left are dead-set on putting the nation on a collision course with another Constitutional Convention. This is something that would NOT be in the best interest of the United States of America...
Interesting times we live in.
Did he pay above market value for his stays? What did he spend compared to Clinton and Obama?
Can you provide the backup data? I'm interested. I would also like to see any links to the lawsuits claiming no voter fraud.