I think your liberal friends are full of it and are looking for silver linings. They'd much rather see Newt. He has some advantages. He's very sharp, has appeal to ideological conservatives, and is good at defending Trump.
However, his weaknesses are much bigger. First, there's an extensive "file" on him. He has been politically active for over 40 years, and it wouldn't be hard to find things he has said over the years that would be considered nutty today. Second, as a master of controversy, he could pull attention away from Trump. Third, he does have some pretty ugly skeletons (can't really say they're in the closet because they're well known). He served his cancer ridden first wife (whom he was cheating on) with divorce papers. He was cheating on his second wife with a Capitol Hill staffer (his current wife) while the Clinton impeachment proceedings were going on. And course don't forget that he has lesbian sister who is politically hostile to him. In some ways, his personal life is messier than Trump's. Fourth, he has taken on the Clintons before in the '90s, and though he was largely successful from a policy standpoint, he was politically pretty inept and didn't sell his position very well.
Let's face it. Not many are willing to be Trump's running mate. That's why he's having to decide between a retread like Gingrich and an unremarkable and mediocre governor from a state of limited relevance. If Rubio or Kasich had won the nomination, they could have picked anybody they wanted.
-
Like x 1
Last edited: Jul 15, 2016