Peters seems to represent the majority view as expressed by the MSM, the Obama Administration, the Intelligence Agencies, and an unknown percentage of the the Pentagon. It's the dominant neocon perspective. I think he's nuts. What do you think?
Carlson went off on a tangent when he thought Peters compared him to Hitler and that's where he lost it. He failed to separate a proposed alliance with a geo-political enemy and being willing to offer that entity a golf-clap for allegedly doing something which promoted our interest. Peter's squeeky voice doesn't help, but he's right about Putin/Russia.
