Fitness Thread

Discussion in 'Quackenbush's' started by TheWalkingHorn, Apr 16, 2015.

  1. Dionysus

    Dionysus peace & love y’all Moderator

    My son’s update — down 49 lbs since June 20 on low carb. He still has the occasional fries or slice of pizza but it hasn’t mattered. The boy is looking great, if I may say so. :clap:

    weight.png
     
    Crockett and TheWalkingHorn like this.
  2. LonghornCatholic

    LonghornCatholic 5,000+ Posts

    Man, thats amazingly impressive! Good for him :hookem:
     
    Dionysus likes this.
  3. I35

    I35 2,500+ Posts

    Walking Horn,

    Sorry it took me a while to respond. I forgot about this topic here. You are putting the right food in your body. Everybody is different so my macros %'s would be different than yours. I did trial and error before I figured out how my body responds. How much cardio are you doing? I'd hit all body parts once a week for strength training. Break out the body parts to hit in a 5 to 6 day rotation. I put one day chest only and destroy it. After lifting replenish asap and no longer than a two hours period. You break down the muscle and your muscles are craving replenishment. If you are eating 1,447 calories a day then I'd add about 50 calories a week. That would put you around 2200 calories in 3 months. If you are having trouble going up at that rate then back down to 25 calorie add per week. We all train our system to handle a certain amount. So you are training your body to handle more calories which is giving you more nutrients in your system. Treat cardio the same way. However many calories you are burning I'd go up 50 more calories burn per week to match your added calories on your diet. You want to be conditioned to get that athletic look you are talking about. After three months re-evaluated where your at to see if you need changes or keep going up on diet and cardio. Without knowing you and following you it's hard to project what you exactly need, but that would be a good starting point. I'll try to check in here more often.
     
    LonghornCatholic likes this.
  4. Dionysus

    Dionysus peace & love y’all Moderator

    The Case Against Sugar, by Gary Taubes
    aeon.co/essays/sugar-is-a-toxic-agent-that-creates-conditions-for-disease

    Gary Taubes is an award-winning science journalist. I have read two of his books on nutrition, Good Calories, Bad Calories and Why We Get Fat. These books show why, for many people, carbohydrate restriction is the key to improving or totally reversing some metabolic disorders — especially obesity and type 2 diabetes. Taubes’ new book, The Case Against Sugar, was just released.

    One important thing Taubes has shown is that the popular view of obesity as a simple behavior problem (overeating and not exercising enough) is mistaken. The current biological science suggests that insulin resistance — the body’s inability to respond to insulin signaling for managing blood glucose and burning stored fat — is the underlying cause of these conditions.

    The full article is at the link above. Below are a few excerpts.

    As it turns out, virtually all hormones work to mobilize fatty acids from fat cells so that they can then be used for fuel. The one dominant exception to this fuel-mobilization signaling is insulin, which partitions how we use the fuels we consume: in particular, it directs fat cells to store fat, while facilitating the uptake and oxidation of glucose (blood sugar) by muscle and organ cells. In other words, when insulin is secreted – primarily in response to the carbohydrates in our diet – it directs our cells to burn carbohydrate as fuel and store fat. And so, the one biological factor necessary to mobilize fat from storage and have it used for fuel, as Yalow and Berson suggested in 1965, is ‘the negative stimulus of insulin deficiency’. Put simply, when insulin levels in circulation are elevated, we store fat and use glucose for fuel; as insulin levels drop, fat is mobilized and we burn it instead.

    Yalow and Berson themselves described insulin as a ‘lipogenic’, or fat-forming hormone. This lipogenic signal must be turned off, or at least muted significantly, for the fat cells to release their stored fat and for the body to metabolize it for energy. […] The more we consume carbohydrates, though, and particularly sugar, the higher our insulin levels will be.

    Insulin is secreted in response to rising blood sugar, and rising blood sugar is a response to a carbohydrate-rich meal. Sugar is implicated, in particular, because its chemical structure includes a large proportion of the carbohydrate fructose, and fructose is preferentially metabolized in the liver. As such, it is a prime suspect for the fat accumulation in liver cells that is hypothesized to be the trigger of insulin resistance itself.

    Hence, the same dietary factors – sugars and refined grains – trigger both obesity and diabetes. By focusing on the problems of eating too much and exercising too little, public health authorities have simply failed to target the correct causes.
     
    LonghornCatholic likes this.
  5. Statalyzer

    Statalyzer 10,000+ Posts

    So TL/DR - if you have too much sugar, your exercise becomes less effective b/c it doesn't burn fat?
     

Share This Page